• 患者服务: 与癌共舞小助手
  • 微信号: yagw_help22

QQ登录

只需一步,快速开始

开启左侧

[基础知识] 关于vc抗癌--从两个临床试验谈起

[复制链接]
4269 0 自学自救 发表于 5 天前 | 查看全部 | 阅读模式 来自: 上海浦东新区

马上注册,结交更多好友,享用更多功能,让你轻松玩转社区。

您需要 登录 才可以下载或查看,没有账号?立即注册

x
VC抗癌说由来已久,众说纷纭;但大多是细胞、动物试验或个例报告,不足为凭。
' Y4 L; A8 O4 ~
1 C: p7 R8 ?' d- i现搜集整理两个VC抗癌的临床试验如下,据此加以研判:3 N8 f. r+ h1 g! b* ~

8 {4 F" @4 R+ N/ r8 Q$ v 7 y! l2 u0 z6 N+ e) G. T! Q& y/ N
1、《A Randomized, Open-Label, Multicenter, Phase 3 Study of High-Dose Vitamin C Plus FOLFOX ± Bevacizumab versus FOLFOX ± Bevacizumab in Unresectable Untreated Metastatic Colorectal Cancer (VITALITY Study)》! L* }* U0 T. Y3 X0 R
. f! a. ]( b# B/ t* V# k
这应该是到目前为止,涉及到VC抗癌的,规模最大的一个随机对照试验。
  T* i9 m# Q8 I. H( ^3 N 0 T8 {" S$ K+ W1 w2 u% t
Patients and methods: Between 2017 and 2019, histologically confirmed patients with mCRC (n = 442) with normal glucose-6-phosphate dehydrogenase status and no prior treatment for metastatic disease were randomized (1:1) into a control (FOLFOX ± bevacizumab) and an experimental [high-dose vitamin C (1.5 g/kg/d, intravenously for 3 hours from D1 to D3) plus FOLFOX ± bevacizumab] group. Randomization was based on the primary tumor location and bevacizumab prescription.
) m1 q% p- C" i0 ^* e: }- V
( [% y# l3 {  [' y8 J0 |试验结果:The progression-free survival (PFS) of the experimental group was not superior to the control group [median PFS, 8.6 vs. 8.3 months; HR, 0.86; 95% confidence interval (CI), 0.70-1.05; P = 0.1]. The objective response rate (ORR) and overall survival (OS) of the experimental and control groups were similar (ORR, 44.3% vs. 42.1%; P = 0.9; median OS, 20.7 vs. 19.7 months; P = 0.7). Grade 3 or higher treatment-related adverse events occurred in 33.5% and 30.3% of patients in the experimental and control groups, respectively. ) I" F) U+ @. j& R' k
; _4 d' }! n- N7 q0 x: o6 Q0 }  J
这个临床试验结果意味着即便是采用了静脉注射的给药方式,即便是用了1.5 g/kg/d这么高的剂量(一个50公斤的患者一天要静脉注射75克之多的VC),从整体而言,传统化疗靶向抗癌治疗增加IVC,也没有给疗效带来有统计学意义上的改善。1 \- g# S1 ]$ [" Z% a9 s

6 e) b4 x! |  e" C* d0 l* b7 \但是,“In prespecified subgroup analyses, patients with RAS mutation had significantly longer PFS (median PFS, 9.2 vs. 7.8 months; HR, 0.67; 95% CI, 0.50-0.91; P = 0.01) with vitamin C added to chemotherapy than with chemotherapy only.”1 h5 |  m- a  K" G5 S0 V
5 u+ {5 j( M' j1 A: {2 K. M" b7 d
在RAS突变(kras、hras、nras)患者中,应用静脉注射大剂量VC,却带来了PFS的统计学意义上的显著改善。* [, H8 C9 |7 h5 g+ \

: l0 M' u9 ?" w$ k- \9 n8 {研究者认为这个结果也是跟临床前研究结论相符的 :“It suggested that the oxidized form of vitamin C, dehydroascorbate, was the pharmaceutically active agent resulting in an energy crisis and colorectal cancer cell death, and the selective cytotoxicity of vitamin C stemmed from high expression of GLUT1 glucose transporter combined with RAS oncogene-induced glycolytic addiction”* G  `( G6 z6 w' R

& X5 p8 a3 T: s. ~另外在超过55岁的老年患者中也带来了PFS上的益处。这或许跟老年患者中VC缺乏比例高(88%)有一定的关系。
8 O# Y) p. L# S3 @! q* o( y% Y ; v. K8 H0 M' ?/ }- O4 K, F- f
研究者认为临床设计上有两个不足:“First, the patients received intravenous high-dose vitamin C for 3 days of every treatment cycle, which might not be enough for vitamin C to show its antitumor effect.”“Second, high-dose vitamin C discontinued at 6 months before the majority of patients progressed, and the true impact of high-dose vitamin C in mCRC may thus be underestimated.”
( b/ x7 h1 o" B& ^1 p1 D ( S" J  k) x( X* ]0 T3 S$ r. L1 k
核心意思就是尽管IVC的单日剂量不小,但是打的天数不多,治疗积累的总量并不算很多,有可能没有让VC发挥出应有的作用来。
1 \1 @8 J* u' b. j( d7 d2 F. G! t
, }! i$ h" e2 ?0 C: M# {% a从这个临床试验结果来看,VC要发挥抗癌作用,关键在于患者的基因突变情况,在于患者的VC缺乏情况,在于VC的给药方式、剂量、剂型、给药频率的情况。不能脱离这些具体条件去得出什么结论。
3 Z- y$ i; e* G( T : Q* D( a$ r( y/ u# y: ?, t
下面这个临床试验也说明了这点。
; ?9 _/ i# t- e9 _6 K8 r
9 s4 s% c' l, Z7 E. B2、《Randomized trial of topical ascorbic acid in DMSO versus imiquimod for the treatment of basal cell carcinoma》4 ?: v% x( x2 {( w' Y. ?

: A  U$ `" L% y3 i* _7 Y: V, `. E. s这是到目前为止,VC抗癌疗效最好的一个临床试验。
) k! h/ M0 P, ]1 U5 a : N/ a0 e" [* X4 a, G0 X% @" N
“The objective of this study was to compare efficacy of a topical solution consisting of 30% ascorbic acid in 95% dimethylsulfoxide with topical imiquimod in the treatment of basal cell carcinoma. Twenty-five patients with 29 biopsy confirmed basal cell carcinomas were randomly assigned to receive either the topically applied ascorbic acid treatment twice daily for 8 weeks or topical imiquimod, a standard and well characterized topical treatment. ”
+ M! u7 D( |9 P- J- U9 ]  l
& D' w% ~6 N7 F% H4 W% R. h( K试验结果:“After 8 weeks, post-treatment biopsy of lesions showed complete resolution of 13/15 (86.7%) in the ascorbic acid group, while 8/14 (57.1%) lesions in the IMQ group were resolved (p < 0.05 Chi Square). Topical ascorbic acid was superior at 8 weeks, and non-inferior at 12 weeks to topical imiquimod in the treatment of low risk nodular and superficial lesions. In addition, ascorbic acid was associated with fewer adverse effects than imiquimod. 70% of patients in the imiquinod group showed residual hypopigmentation at 30mo follow up versus 0% in the ascorbate group.”, Y2 j" P, x" A) v: n9 B

1 H$ }. V5 v; Y: M- ^剂型上把ascorbic acid 溶在 DMSO这个渗透力极强的无毒的佐剂里,给药方式上采用涂抹这种药物直接接触病灶的方式,这样保证了药物在病灶内的局部高浓度,这是临床试验成功的关键。
% c2 ?! f# x/ A) U" t0 ^ 7 w9 Y  M2 y6 j1 c) K# n
按照这两个临床试验的思路,完成可以拓展VC-DMSO药液对RAS突变患者或者严重缺乏VC患者病灶实施病灶表面给药或者瘤体内直接给药的治疗。2 ?% N, g5 [- y  f; ]8 Y% R

发表回复

您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

本版积分规则

  • 回复
  • 转播
  • 评分
  • 分享
帮助中心
网友中心
购买须知
支付方式
服务支持
资源下载
售后服务
定制流程
关于我们
关于我们
友情链接
联系我们
关注我们
官方微博
官方空间
微信公号
快速回复 返回顶部 返回列表